Sex now or later? Does sexual harassment decrease?
Are teen’s adolescents waiting for longer than other teenagers to reduce the chances of practicing sexual intercourse in their teens?
This is only one of the arguments presented by supporters of crime education that it will delay the sex of the people (which may not be the case too).
While they believe that initial sex is negative for many religious and moral reasons, I think that they also believe that it protects the adolescent. If they are not sex till the later age, then they will give less chance to take sexual exposure, right?
Well it's not at all. According to a new study under the chairmanship of psychology professor at the University of South Florida (Maria Bornovalova), sexual harassment does not show the reason for taking a sexual risk.
Specifically, when they compared the pair of identical twins - only 16 years before them had sex - sexual harassment in their lives (i.e. unsafe sex, using drugs during sexual intercourse, unprotected sex) There were similar incidents. More than 1000 pairs of twins were studied.
So what is the reason for taking sexual exposure? According to this study, social earnings, such as low income and poor home life, and genetics are very strong predictions of taking sexual risks against sexual behavior. The author of the study explains.
That there may be others negative side effects of having sex, such as it is collaboration with depression. But, according to the authors, it is a matter of taking sexual risks, if we want to promote safe sex, waiting for sex till age does not seem to be a solution.
0.000 SRY