State rights over citizens.

State rights over citizens.

Contrary to these rights of the citizens, some rights of the state have also been imposed on them. The first to be heard is the right to obedience. In Islamic terminology, it is called "listening and obeying." The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) made this clear:

Listening, following and obeying - at the right time, at the right time, in all the joys and sorrows. This means that it is the duty of all citizens to observe and obey the laws of the state, whether they like it or not, whether it is easy or difficult.

The citizens of the Islamic State will be loyal friends and benefactors of the state - this is the second most important right of the Islamic State towards its citizens. To understand this in Quran and Hadith. Terminology used. Its meaning in Arabic is more extensive and wide than Loyalty and Allegiance. Every citizen will seek the welfare of the state with sincerity and devotion, the citizens will not tolerate any act harmful to him. It will establish a sincere relationship with the welfare and well-being - this is the underlying concept of the word 'Nushah'.

This is not the end, the citizens of the Islamic State have been forced to do even more. It is the duty of the citizens to fully cooperate with the Islamic government. They will not hesitate to sacrifice their lives and property for its maintenance and implementation of its purpose. Even if a calamity befalls the Islamic government, if a capable person sacrifices his life and property in the defense of Darul Islam, one of the servants of Allah will rise up and wage a great and open jihad against him. As a result, the path to this deadly purpose has been blocked. History bears witness to what Imam Ibn Taymiyyah and Mujaddid al-Fasani did against such attempts.

Question: Allah's command: - Their state affairs are done by their mutual consultation, whether women will be considered in the word 'their' in the sentence? That is, whether the women will be accepted in the consultation meeting?

Answer: One verse of Quran is not in conflict with any other verse. Rather one is the nurturer and interpreter of the other. In the Qur'an in which this is said, it is also said that men are the leaders of women. That is why the Quran has closed the door for women to participate in the Majlis as the Shura or Parliament is the ruler of the whole state and state. In addition, we have before us the activities of the Prophet Kareem (peace be upon him) and the Khilafah Rasheda era as the norm. There is no doubt that this is a valuable authentic way for us to interpret and analyze the main purpose of the Qur'an. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and Kholafaye Rashedin have never included women in the Majlis of Shura '.

Q: What will be the source of income of the Islamic State? Generally, everyone thinks that there will be no tax other than Zakat, Jiya and Kharaj. So if this is true, then how can the essential expenditure burden of a modern state be met within the limits of Islam today?

Answer: No tax can be levied to meet the needs of the Islamic State. This is completely wrong. And to think that zakat is a tax to meet the needs of the government is a more serious mistake. Basically, zakat is just a fund for social insurance. It is levied to distribute among specific and special people. Then the final point about meeting the needs of the government is that it is not the need of the government, basically the people will be reluctant to do it at all, the Qur'an has openly called him a 'hypocrite'.

From the above discussion, the real form of the state that is becoming brighter is what we call Islamic rule. No matter what name such a system of government may be called in modern terms, secular (secular) or democratic (democratic), whatever you may say, there is no obstacle in it. Because we have no argument about the terminology - about the name. Our main goal is that our way of life and governance should be based on the principles that we demand to accept Islam. This is our demand and for this all our efforts and endeavors are devoted exclusively.

Question: Were the Muslim governments established at different times after Rashedar in Khilafah Islamic rule or something else?

Answer: Originally they were neither full Islamic rule nor fully un-Islamic. Two very important principles of Islamic rule were changed in it. The first point of the Islamic constitution is that the position of its chief authority will be electoral. The second is that governance will work through consultation. Besides, if other aspects of the constitution are not present with the correct conception of Islam; But these two policies cannot be changed or repealed in any way. In the earlier Muslim states, the Qur'an and the Sunnah were recognized as the source of law. Islamic law was introduced in the courts. The Muslim rulers of the time did not dare to repeal Islamic law and issue man-made laws. Sometimes a ruler needs courage to do something like that.

It is also the duty of the people to raise the necessary funds and resources to carry out the work that they want to do through the state. The government has to pay the 'dues' of the people in order to complete the state-owned work, as is the custom in other public works. Taxes are basically nothing more than a tribute.

There is a huge difference in principle between the taxes that have been protested in our ancient fiqh texts and the revenue of the present age. In the old days, taxes were not considered as a public fund. It was a kind of duty, the royal government collected it from the subjects and it was spent according to the wishes of the kings. They did not have the responsibility to spend the money and resources collected from the people for the work of the people and to hold them accountable to the people.

That is why this kind of tax has been declared haraam and illegitimate in Islam. Now that the basic conditions of the tax have changed, the tax guidelines will inevitably change.

I am not discussing the caliphate of the whole world here. My statement is limited to the establishment of Islamic rule in this country. If Islamic rule is established in different Muslim states on the basis of the principles I have described, then there may be a need to form a ‘federation’ of all of them and elect a caliph from all over the Islamic world. But ‘seventy-two sects?’ Is mentioned only on the pages of ancient theology, in fact there are only three sects present in this country. One is Hanafi, the second is Ahl al-Hadith and the third is Shia. And the scholars of these three groups have jointly laid down the principles of the Islamic State. Therefore, there is no reason to fear that the position of these groups will be an obstacle to the establishment of Islamic rule.